Wife of Tommy Morrison, Boxing Champion Dead at 44, Cites Numerous Illnesses Not Associated with HIV

image

By John Strangis

Tommy “The Duke” Morrison passed away Sunday night after a long period of suffering from numerous health issues. News reports regarding his fight with illness have attributed his health issues to being caused by untreated HIV/AIDS, but his wife, Trisha Morrison, tells a whole different story.

Trisha insists that his death was caused by multiple organ failure and that he was suffering from Miller Fisher syndrome/Guillain-Barré syndrome and other health problems caused by the negligence of the hospital staff and not by HIV.

Tommy Morrison was an American heavyweight boxer and a former World Boxing Organization champion. His career ended when he tested positive for HIV in 1996. He made a comeback in 2006 and tested negative several times before becoming seriously ill. His problems started with an infection caused by a tick bite to the chest, for which he sought hospital treatment.

Once admitted, and after numerous medical procedures, his health deteriorated, but he kept on fighting. During his ordeal, Trisha continued to seek for answers from professionals who kept claiming he was ill because of untreated HIV infection. It seems that nobody could provide her with satisfactory information confirming this. Below are quotes from emails I have received from Trisha Morrison, wife of Tommy Morrison, who has given me permission to make them public.

Since August of 2011 Tommy has endured the following:

Coincidences?

And all because of HIV-AIDS and HIV encephalopathy?

[. . .]

*we get off the phone with Andrew Breitbart of BigGovernment.com in July 2011[,] who was planning on whistleblowing [against] HIV[,] AIDS [and reputed HIV discoverer Dr.] Robert Gallo ~ and then Andrew dies a few months later of natural causes~coroner also dies a few months later of arsenic poisoning and WE begin our “journey”
*wrongful imprisonment of 3 weeks [August-September] 2011 for being a fugitive? Losing 30 lbs due to malnutrition ~ having to exchange his socks for a packet of oatmeal
*wrongful arrest and thrown in jail for loitering/standing too long at the sunglass stand at [Wal-Mart, the] day after being bailed out of jail for wrongful arrest/imprisonment of 3 weeks
*involved in a car accident and blamed for it due to [driving while intoxicated]. sent to jail and not hospital. Blood and urine test came back negative and police forced to drop case.
*tick bite to the chest and infecting pectoral implant and removal of major and minor muscle as well
*surgery on chest and 12 [feet of] gauze left in chest for 8 days ~ body went [into] septic shock
*fall after removal of septic gauze
*torticollis [twisted neck position]
*chest wound
*sacrum wound
*hip wound
*insertion of gastric tube
*3 further surgeries for insertion of gastric tube due to nurse pulling out original and body going [into] septic shock
*insertion of [PICC] line [an intravenous tube commonly used for long-term infusions] in June 2012
*removal of [PICC] line and reinsertion of new [PICC] line in [August] 2012 on other arm
*potassium supplement overdose of 7.5 [unit of measurement unclear] and going through hemodialysis
*incorrect total parenteral nutrition ([TPN]) bag hung with no electrolytes for 3 days
*iron supplement overdose and ferritin level of 2069 [ng/mL] [WebMD states: “Very high ferritin levels (greater than 1,000 ng/mL) can mean a large buildup of iron in the body.]
*diagnosed with [M]iller [F]isher/[G]uillain[-B]arr[é] syndrome ~ inability to speak~eat~move~breathe
*undergoing 4 months of [IVIG] (Intravenous immunoglobulin) treatment
*on vent[ilator] on 3 occasions due to p[n]eumonia
*teeth broken and swallowed during intubation
*fluid around heart drained
*fluid around lungs drained
*urinary tract infections
*countless tests that state they DON’T detect “[HIV] infection”
*[CD]4 count tests that are not even recognised in Europe
*hemolytic anaemia
*seizure due to contra[indicated] meds
*oxygen turned off in error by nurse
*[CT] scan results not followed up by doctor[,] causing coughing up of blood and quick bronchoscopy
*ultrasound of veins result not followed up by doctor[,] causing delay in removal of infected [PICC] line
*2 trials at removing infected [PICC] line[,] with success on second surgery
*skin graft surgery on sacrum
*wound [V.A.C.] treatment on sacrum for months
*on and off wound [V.A.C.] and insertions [to] hip wound
*gastro[intestinal] secretion sample result not followed up by doctor[,] causing delay in removal of infected [gastrointestinal tube (G-tube)]
*abnormal [cerebrospinal] fluid not tested for all regular tests [given] when someone has an abnormal result
*insertion of a temporary [tracheostomy] to avoid further intubation[-]extubation issues and breathing issues
*fluctuating nutrition levels due to malnutrition
*little [parenteral nutrition] and [occupational therapy?] given
*platelets critically low
*[red blood cells] critically low
*[white blood cells] critically low
*various [MRI] and [CT] scans
*heart [medicines] sending his heart and breathing into critical state
*numerous daily blood draws
*blood being lost at the labs or going to the labs?
*hospital bugs such as enterococcus ~pseudomonas~[MRS]~[C. difficile]
*every antibiotic perhaps on the market
*a stupid doctor saying that she would give Magic Johnson [CPR] but NOT Tommy Morrison!
*code red 3 times and [no one] willing to help me ~ I just prayed and cried and shouted at him to keep breathing
*back of head biopsied due to swelling ~stitches removed~biopsy negative~wound split open on back of head and wound [dressing] changes done daily now
*daily wound [dressing] changes of 3 times a day for one year
*daily wound [dressing] changes for hip and sacrum wound
*new [G-tube] due to be reinserted in next day or so
*another seizure possibly due to contra[indicated] meds or right side of brain injury due to boxing or fall after septic chest wound gauze removed
*current location drew blood for [electron microscopy] test but lost it????
*weaned off [ventilator] successfully 5 times already

So it’s [A]ugust 2013:

*chest wound healed
*sacrum wound and hip wound in healing process
*[Intravenous immunoglobulin] treatment successful in getting rid of [GQ1B] antibodies specific to [Miller Fisher/Guillain-Barré syndromes]
*new [PIKK] line inserted and working
*making platelets slowly
*[White blood count] improving
*[Red blood count] greatly improved
*electrolytes improving [on] balance
*[B]oston[’s] [M]assachusetts [G]en[eral] [H]ospital performed [electron microscopy] on blood -July 2012 and was negative for “[HIV]” virus [Reporter’s note: The University of Massachusetts electron microscopist has been threatened with an internal investigation for his work on behalf of HIV “criminal transmission” defendants. The Office of Medical and Scientific Justice (OMSJ), a licensed California private investigative agency assisting in these criminal cases, has filed a complaint with the U.S. Air Force over this, pursuant to a possible civil lawsuit.]
*[K]ary [M]ullis, [Ph.D.,] [Nobel Laureate and] inventor of [the PCR technology used in the “viral load”] test[,] confirms via email [that] his test does not test for “[HIV]”

Prayers needed on:

*continued strength to carry on this journey
*doctors and nurses that care and don[’]t give up and are not quick to give a death sentence
*recovery from [Miller Fisher/Guillain-Barré syndromes]
*[re]solution of abnormal [cerebrospinal fluid levels]
*nutrition level back to normal
*strength level improvement to normal
*breathing and lungs in check
*solution and resolution of brain swelling/fluid in ventricles

And:

For the world to know that Tommy does NOT harbor a contagious infectious virus that has been
named “HIV.”

Trisha for Tommy
Written to me by Tommy just before this all began…
(Don’t give up on me, my love!!! — Tommy)
~not giving up on him~
~signed by his “[HIV] NEGATIVE” wife!!!

///

[Reporter’s note: In addition, electron micrograph testing was performed on a sample of Tommy’s blood. Following are portions of a report written by Andrew Maniotis, PhD; a report of 20 pages which describes in detail how tests were performed showing no virus particles in the blood of Tommy Morrison even while exhibiting a high “viral load” with polymerase chain reaction testing. Also included is an email from Kary Mullis (inventor of the polymerase chain reaction) to Trisha Morrison, ]

///

COMPARISONS OF “HIV” VIRAL LOAD MEASUREMENTS WITH ACTUAL COUNTS OF VIRIONS: CASE REPORTS AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Andrew Maniotis, PhD., 1

1. Partnership For Cures (Cures Within Reach), Chicago, Ill.

Abstract

Viral load tests have been under increasing suspicion of detecting false-positive signals. The HIV-1 viral load measurement indicates the number of copies of “HIV-1” RNA per milliliter of plasma. Here we present a case in which we calibrated an “HIV-1” viral load measurement of 204, 000 / mL as determined by PCR tests, against the actual number of “HIV-1” viral-like particles in the peripheral blood of the same patient.  No HIV-1, hepatitis C, or any other kind of viral-like particles, bacteria, fungi,  Lyme or syphilis spirochetes or their round bodies, or mycoplasma were observed at any magnification in or around any red or white blood cells, or in plasma. Confirmatory ultrastructural testing following PCR analysis of blood from the same patient could help eliminate false-positive viral load testing. Changes in PCR diagnostic protocols for viral load measurements are warranted, especially in cases where disease syndromes are present that are known to confound various molecular tests.  Electron microscope verification also may generate significant financial savings, and better patient care, by rapidly and inexpensively dispensing with false positive PCR readings in peripheral blood and in a variety of  infectious processes.

Keywords: PCR, electron microscopy, viral load, “HIV/AIDS.

This project was in part supported by a gift from The Office of Medical and Scientific Justice. No conflicts of interests of the author is reported.

Introduction                                                                                                                          

            In only the past several years, “HIV/AIDS” diagnoses have encountered a series of increasing challenges regarding the specificity of any of the protein or nucleic acid tests.  To address these challenges, we compared viral load readings to actual particle counts of virus-like particles of the same blood draw’s sera. The first patient,  whose case history is dominantly featured here, had battled “HIV” diagnoses that ruined his professional boxing career for 23 years, and he never consumed ARV’s until recently. In January of 2012 he became paralyzed and unable to speak following a tetanus vaccine, and was diagnosed by neuologists as being a victim of traumatic brain injury and Guillain-Barre Syndrome. By July, 2012, he had his blood analyzed with a direct Coombs test, and he tested positive for severe anemia by various criteria.  This diagnosis suggested that his red blood cells were being destroyed by self-directed antibodies. Hypergammaglobulinemia also was noted, and, could, in principle, confound protein and nucleic acid tests that measure antibodies or gene fragments as evidence of infection with an exogenous pathogen. Direct electron microscopic observation of the anemic blood failed to detect one (1) “HIV-virus-like particle” in the same peripheral blood samples in which PCR testing detected a rising and then falling count between 252,000–9,090,000 in the absense of ARV’s, and a VL reading of 14,000  “HIV-1” RNA copies/ mL, following a short-course of ARV administration given by accident in an ICU.  During the 15 months of this patient’s profound illness, these  fluctuations and these divergent results of different  tests  increased and decreased, while all his CBC counts improved, and  his lymphocytes and RBC’s steadily increased, in the absense of ARV’s. The upward limit of Quest and LabCorp HIV tests using PCR is 10,000,000 copies HIV mRNA/mL, and the lowest limit of “viral-like particle detection for HIV is now reported using fluoresnt techniques and EM is < 5 particles/mL.

           In this study we then wanted to analyze a number of individuals’ ”HIV-positive” plasma samples (and in some cases, lymphocytic cells), by employing electron microscopy of fresh and carefully fixed serum (plasma), while simultaneously testing that same blood draw with PCR (using standard reference lab quantitative PCR VL testing), to determine the “viral load” of that sample in the absence of ARV’s. As absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence, and despite our repeatedly negative findings using EM even after using different fixation protocols on a series of different patient plasma samples, we reasoned that it should be relatively straightforward to demonstrate adequate size and titration controls for any putative virus presence using nano particles, and/ or, develop a methodology for similarly equiped and experienced “HIV” diagnostic testing labs to repeat the protocol, and then provide us with a positive EM example showing the presence of at least 1-3 “HIV” viral-like particles.  Alternatively, we considered that “HIV” PCR and protein readings for years have likely represented extreme oxidation states in ill persons, hypergammaglobulinemia, or more than 100 other known reasons to register positive on either nucleic acid or protein-based “HIV” tests [1-11, 13-59, 61-120].  Finally, these electron microscopy results suggest that even extremely high PCR viral load measurements do not indicate the presence of any exogenous “HIV-viral-like” particles, or viremia in vivo [69-71].

In this study we then wanted to analyze a number of individuals’ ”HIV-positive” plasma samples (and in some cases, lymphocytic cells), by employing electron microscopy of fresh and carefully fixed serum (plasma), while simultaneously testing that same blood draw with PCR (using standard reference lab quantitative PCR VL testing), to determine the “viral load” of that sample in the absence of ARV’s. As absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence, and despite our repeatedly negative findings using EM even after using different fixation protocols on a series of different patient plasma samples, we reasoned that it should be relatively straightforward to demonstrate adequate size and titration controls for any putative virus presence using nano particles, and/ or, develop a methodology for similarly equiped and experienced “HIV” diagnostic testing labs to repeat the protocol, and then provide us with a positive EM example showing the presence of at least 1-3 “HIV” viral-like particles.  Alternatively, we considered that “HIV” PCR and protein readings for years have likely represented extreme oxidation states in ill persons, hypergammaglobulinemia, or more than 100 other known reasons to register positive on either nucleic acid or protein-based “HIV” tests [1-11, 13-59, 61-120].  Finally, these electron microscopy results suggest that even extremely high PCR viral load measurements do not indicate the presence of any exogenous “HIV-viral-like” particles, or viremia in vivo [69-71].

Viral load numbers compared to particle counts in the sera of 10 individuals: Patient identifiers have been removed and replaced with viral load readings rather than  names.

VIRAL LOAD                                           […] VIRAL-LIKE PARTICLES     […]PATIENT INFO

252, 000,  4,100,906,  204,000,1,930,000,  9,090,000,  14,000* 0 Professional athlete, Guillain-Barre Syndrome following tetanuus vaccination
49, 000 0 Bell’s Palsy, “HIV+ Scotland
2,000, 000 0 Life threatening C. difficille infection, “HIV+woman”
4, 000, 500 0 Hemophilia
5, 700, 000 0 African Immigrant, “HIV+”
700, 500 0 “HIV+” woman
3, 090, 500 0 “HIV+ “Gold-coast” African
2, 120, 000 0 “HIV+” African American female
3, 000, 200 0 “HIV+ American male

 

7, 050 000 0 Young mother naive to ARV’s

 

Notes From Kary Mullis, Inventor of The Polymerase Chain Reaction and Nobel Recipient: The answer lies in THE SEQUENCE? Re: PCR  question. “HIV” DNA/RNA sequences in your BLOOD is sufficient cause for PHYSICIANS to pronounce AIDS.

Dear Kary~as you mentioned~there is another independent measure not related to DNA~but its still BLOOD related- using an EM to photograph the blood to detect the virus named “HI.”
How come I can have a viral load of 9 million copies/mL  using your PCR  method, and not one virus show in the blood?
What sequence are they using? And how can YOU prove this? EM is the ultimate method ~ but we need to disprove the sequence of “HIV.”

Trisha Harding Morrison, Date: Sat, May 11, 2013 5:55 pm

Dear Tommy (and Trisha),

A number of diseases are detected by the fact that using two sequences known to be contained in the DNA/RNA of some organism and running a PCR reaction, containing that DNA, a fragment of a known size predictable from the sequence of that organism will be produced.  Further evidence (and much more credible) for the presence of that particular organism can be obtained by sequencing the fragment so obtained. An intermediate level of confidence can be obtained by so-called hybridization of the obtained fragment with a known sequence standard.

Most diseases can be diagnosed with some independent measure not related to DNA, but over the years DNA evidence has become a well-trusted method, and the mere presence of HIV DNA sequences in your blood is sufficient cause for most physicians to pronounce that you have AIDS and treat you for it. (You can have your prostate gland surgically removed based on higher than expected levels of prostate hormone, but I wouldn’t recommend it without collaborative evidence of rampant prostate cancer.)

The issue of assigning meaning to the evidence of HIV sequences in people is in my opinion the real outstanding issue, and my opinion is that there is insufficient evidence to conclude that such sequences are dangerous enough to the person (if at all) to justify a treatment that may very well be.

I have made myself clear on this issue for years. If I were to discover something which would make me think otherwise, I would feel honor-bound to make that very public.

Sadly anybody who can read and really wants to know about the issue of AIDS can read about it forever and still not know much about it as it is a highly contested issue and the financial consequences are immense. There are a large number of such issues in the world. Welcome to Earth.

PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of the virus itself.  The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment (not virus isolation). They have to be in the sequence for it to be amplified in the first place, but they can be rather a small part of the total sequence. (Two to three hundred nucleotides is usually chosen out of several thousand in the total retrovirus).  When incorporated in a cell the virus exists as DNA, when it is released from the cell in its infectious form it is RNA; which can be converted easily into DNA in the cell or in vitro for purposes of amplification. There are many sequence variations among the sequences called HIV.  Any one of them can get you classed as what they consider HIV positive. And due to the tiny amounts of nucleic acid detectable after many cycles of PCR amplification (after 30 cycles one copy will get you about a billion copies) the test is super sensitive. Antibodies are detected by a non-PCR test called an EIisa. Elisa testing is not so specific as PCR as there are many antibodies not specific to HIV which may cross-react in this test. If a sequence amplifies with primers designed to HIV, it is HIV by definition.  In order to amplify and produce a fragment of approximately the correct size the original sequence must hybridize with the primers, and therefore it must be at least a very close match (at least at the primer sites) to what has been defined as HIV. (now called HIV-AIDS in case there are any skeptics).

Kary Mullis,  Date: Tue, May 7, 2013 4:44 pm

///

Conclusion:

After reading this, anyone with a rational thinking mind can at least speculate that there is definitely something fishy going on when it comes to HIV/AIDS. It’s time to question the original HIV theory given to the people by the CDC, FDA etc, and demand answers.

I know what I believe: HIV is a fraud.

John Strangis